13 Jan

DUI and Marijuana – Explained by a DUI Attorney

http://www.nevadaduilawyer.com/images/DUI_Defense_Reno_11.jpg

Everyone understands a good friend, a mutual friend, or daddy’s bro’s nephew’s cousin’s former roomie, who received a DUI citation for drinking and driving. Throughout the uncommon times that the roommate talks about the DUI, there is normally a story or total rejection that it actually happened, then the inescapable explanation or suggestions about exactly what he or she would have done differently if the exact same scenario presented itself once again.

But very few individuals know anyone who has received a DUI citation for driving after using marijuana. In truth, many people don’t even understand you can receive a DUI citation for owning under the impact of cannabis.

Prior to I get too far, I wish to let you know that I am a Maryland DUI lawyer, Virginia DUI attorney, and DC DUI attorney. While this short article is geared towards those jurisdictions, this is not legal advice. It is simply information, and is not particular to any circumstance. If you require legal suggestions or expert assistance for your own situation, then you need to get in touch with a lawyer that is accredited in your state.

So what does a DUI including cannabis entail?

1) Elements of the offense.

There are two primary elements of the offense of owning under the influence of marijuana. The first and apparently obvious aspect is that the driver should have been driving a motor vehicle. While this component is usually indisputable, there are celebrations where there is a concern of whether the person was actually owning. Visit dui lawyers ft. lauderdale .

Second, the prosecution must prove that the driver was under the impact of cannabis. Simply puts, the motorist needs to have consumed marijuana and the consumption of cannabis must have hindered the individual’s ability to own.

2) How does the State prove it?

There are two basic manner ins which the prosecution will provide proof that the motorist is DUI. First, the policeman, or officers, who existed at the traffic stop will affirm to a range of unbiased symptoms of problems in order to justify the arrest. In addition to standardized field sobriety tests, the officers will testify about how the motorist looked, acted, smelled, spoke, and numerous other things that they can observe. Second, the prosecution may have a clinical test, which shows whether there was cannabis in the motorist’s body.

3) Exactly what is the issue?

Actually there are two significant problems with the State proving owning under the impact of cannabis cases.

Unlike alcohol, there is no precise way to determine tetrahydrocannabinol levels (the active ingredient in marijuana, THC for short) due to the fact that a person can check favorable for as much as thirty days after consuming marijuana. In addition, for how long the THC will stay in a person’s body and be detectable by a scientific test depends upon several elements. As a result, it is hard to measure when the driver really took the drug.

Without a practical and dependable way to determine the level of THC in a motorist, the police need to resort to using other kinds of testing such as carrying out field sobriety tests on the motorist. Field sobriety tests are really subjective and bothersome to administer fairly, regularly, and meaningfully. Cannabis cases present a lot more issues in this regard due to the fact that there is disagreement as to whether there is even a connection in between cannabis and disability associated to owning an automobile. Yet officers every day testify in court that, based on their understanding and experience as a policeman, the driver was so impaired she or he could not run a motor vehicle securely.